The workflow problem
A research organization cannot assume every new joiner follows the same checklist. Applicable onboarding activities depend on department, employee level and laboratory allocation, and the responsible person changes with those conditions.
What we built
The application determines applicable onboarding tasks from configuration instead of relying on a person to build each checklist manually.
- Department, level and group configuration determine which questions and tasks apply.
- Department and laboratory allocation route work to the correct leads.
- Verification steps require review where configured, including mandatory comments for negative decisions.
- Submitted tasks become read-only and employees can only be archived after required work is complete.
- LDAP import, Excel bulk import and pre-joining email reminders reduce repetitive administration.
Why controlled archival matters
The workflow prevents incomplete or mutable records from being treated as finished onboarding history. That makes the archived record more useful for later review and administration.
Making ownership visible across departments
Onboarding crosses HR, line management, laboratories and support functions, so delays often occur at handoffs rather than within one team. A role-based workflow makes the next owner visible and gives each participant only the actions relevant to their stage. Automated reminders are then tied to workflow state instead of depending on somebody remembering which person still needs to act.
Why archival is part of the workflow
Completed onboarding records may still need to be found later. Controlled archival keeps the final set of actions and supporting information connected to the employee record instead of dispersing it across mailboxes or shared folders. The same structure also makes it easier to distinguish a completed process from one that was abandoned or is still waiting for verification.

Sai Life Sciences